Terrain
Surface, slope, drainage, hardness.
Utility-Scale Solar Design
Design for the site you will actually build.
Terrain, grading, cabling, shading, and stakeholder handoff in one model.
Less software theater. More engineering signal.
A Better Sequence
One model. One order of operations.
Surface, slope, drainage, hardness.
Pile limits, grading depth, cable routes.
Earthwork, BOS, annual loss.
Quantified
Combined earthwork and cable signal before construction begins.
Conventional grading
Pile-adaptive grading
70% less earthwork on hard-rock terrain.
$429,936
Cable CAPEX Saved
44%
Very Hard Rock
Terrain
No flat-earth assumption. Import the real surface. Read slope and elevation before layout decisions become rework.
Grading
Conventional smoothing changes the whole site. Pile-adaptive grading changes only the ground the racks actually need.
118K m3
Conventional Cut
34.8K m3
Adaptive Cut
3.0m → 0.8m
Cut Depth
Civil Risk
Drainage and soil hardness should shape the layout before it is approved.
Read flood paths before ground is broken.
See driving difficulty and pile risk while the design is still editable.
Electrical
Cabling is calculated on real site corridors, not bird's-eye guesses. That is where the savings become defensible.
Performance
Spacing, shading, cable length, and annual loss move together.
46%
Shading Swing
997
MWh Annual Swing
See the loss pattern across the terrain.
Translate geometry into cost and energy.
Workflow
Design in AutoCAD. Validate in 3D. Share in the browser. The same project model moves from engineering to stakeholder review without translation.
Speed
Automation is useful only when the rest of the system stays coherent. The output should still carry terrain logic, constructability checks, and export readiness.
Trusted
Used by solar developers, EPCs, and engineering teams that need the design to survive contact with terrain.